Galileo and the church

Controversies · 1610–1633 · Florence and Rome

The Galileo affair is usually told as science against religion, with the church on the side of ignorance. The real story is stranger. The evidence was less settled than the legend says, the argument about the Bible was more careful, and the trial had as much to do with a pope's pride as with the planets.

02

What was actually at stake

Three questions were tangled together.

What the evidence showed. Galileo's telescope (1610) found moons orbiting Jupiter and phases of Venus. These ruined the old earth-centred system of Ptolemy. They did not prove Copernicus right, because the system of Tycho Brahe, in which the planets circle the sun and the sun circles a still earth, fitted the same observations. The direct proof that the earth moves, the shifting of nearby stars as the earth orbits (stellar parallax), was not measured until 1838.

Who may interpret Scripture. Verses like Joshua 10:12–13 and Psalm 104:5 speak of the sun moving and the earth fixed. Galileo argued, in his Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina (1615), that the Bible speaks in the language of ordinary appearance and is meant to teach "how one goes to heaven, not how the heavens go". Many churchmen agreed in principle. But after the Reformation, Rome was deeply wary of laymen reinterpreting Scripture on their own authority.

A broken promise and an insulted pope. In 1616 Galileo had been told not to hold or defend Copernicanism as true. His Dialogue (1632) did exactly that, and put an argument of Pope Urban VIII, who had been his friend and patron, in the mouth of a character called Simplicio. The trial was about disobedience as much as astronomy.

03

Who held what

Each stated as its holders would have stated it.

The sun is at the centre, really

Galileo Galilei, and a minority of astronomers

Copernicus described how the heavens actually are, not just a convenient way of calculating them. Where Scripture seems to say otherwise, it is speaking as things appear.

Why they held it Because his telescope had broken the old system, and because he believed truth cannot contradict truth: God wrote both the book of Scripture and the book of nature.

Treat it as a hypothesis until it is proved

Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, in his letter to Foscarini (1615)

Copernicus may be used as a model that saves the appearances. If it were ever truly demonstrated, the church would have to reinterpret the passages that seem to contradict it, carefully. But it has not been demonstrated.

Why they held it Because the plain sense of Scripture, read the same way by the church fathers, should not be set aside for an unproven theory.

The earth is still, and the planets circle the sun

Followers of Tycho Brahe, including many Jesuit astronomers

The planets go round the sun, and the sun and moon go round a stationary earth.

Why they held it Because it fitted every telescopic observation then available, including the phases of Venus, and needed no motion of the earth, which nobody could detect.

04

What actually happened

The condemnation came fast. The retreat from it took centuries.

  1. 1543Copernicus publishes On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres.
  2. 1610Galileo's Starry Messenger reports Jupiter's moons. The phases of Venus follow later that year.
  3. 1616The Congregation of the Index suspends Copernicus's book "until corrected". Galileo is warned not to hold or defend the theory.
  4. 1632Galileo publishes the Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems.
  5. 1633Tried and found "vehemently suspect of heresy". He recants and is sentenced to house arrest, where he dies in 1642, still writing.
  6. 1758The general ban on books teaching the earth's motion is quietly dropped from the Index.
  7. 1992Pope John Paul II receives the findings of a commission on the case and acknowledges that Galileo's judges erred.

Why it still matters

Because the same tangle keeps returning. When a claim about nature and a reading of Scripture seem to collide, it helps to separate the questions the way Galileo's case did not: what does the evidence actually show yet, what is the text actually claiming, and who is being trusted to decide.

Sources

  1. Maurice A. Finocchiaro, ed., The Galileo Affair: A Documentary History (University of California Press, 1989), which includes the letters and trial documents.
  2. Galileo Galilei, Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina (1615).
  3. Robert Bellarmine, Letter to Paolo Antonio Foscarini (12 April 1615).
  4. Ronald L. Numbers, ed., Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion (Harvard University Press, 2009).
  5. Annibale Fantoli, Galileo: For Copernicanism and for the Church, 3rd ed. (Vatican Observatory, 2003).